vault backup: 2025-04-15 08:40:18
This commit is contained in:
parent
3e2dc34e61
commit
12f2215a18
1 changed files with 12 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -12,4 +12,15 @@ If we consider S(2) as the specification of the expected behavior of a binary se
|
||||||
This means that the implementation and the specification do coincide. To show this equivalence, it suffices to show that following relation is a bisimulation:
|
This means that the implementation and the specification do coincide. To show this equivalence, it suffices to show that following relation is a bisimulation:
|
||||||

|

|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Congruence
|
## Restrictions
|
||||||
|
**Proposition:** a.P\a ∼ 0
|
||||||
|
*Proof:*
|
||||||
|
- S = {(a.P\a , 0)} is a bisimulation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Which challenges can (a.P)\a have?
|
||||||
|
- a.P can only perform a (and become P)
|
||||||
|
- however, because of restriction, a.P\a is stuck
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No challenge from a.P\a, nor from 0 à bisimilar!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Proposition:**
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue