vault backup: 2025-04-04 23:58:09
This commit is contained in:
parent
8e517b1bd4
commit
1ce5aec8cd
13 changed files with 34 additions and 50 deletions
|
@ -21,9 +21,9 @@ A complete history $\hat{H}$ is **linearizable** if there exists a sequential hi
|
|||
|
||||
Given an history $\hat{K}$, we can define a binary relation on events $⟶_{K}$ s.t. (op, op’) ∈ ⟶K if and only if res[op] <K inv[op’]. We write op ⟶K op’ for denoting (op, op’) ∈ ⟶K. Hence, condition 3 of the previous Def. requires that ⟶H ⊆ ⟶S.
|
||||
|
||||
![[/Concurrent Systems/notes/images/Pasted image 20250318090733.png]]
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
![[/Concurrent Systems/notes/images/Pasted image 20250318090909.png]]But there is another linearization possible! I can also push a before if I pull it before c!
|
||||
But there is another linearization possible! I can also push a before if I pull it before c!
|
||||
Of course I have to respect the semantics of a Queue (if I push "a" first, I have to pop "a" first because it's a fucking FIFO)
|
||||
|
||||
#### Compositionality theorem
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue