vault backup: 2025-03-10 10:40:13
This commit is contained in:
parent
a03d441faa
commit
4f3268bda9
3 changed files with 13 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -246,4 +246,13 @@ unlock(i) :=
|
|||
- Otherwise let $p_j$ be the process that enters, its next date is $n+1 > DATE[i]$
|
||||
- $p_{j}$ cannot surpass $p_i$ again (before a RESET)
|
||||
- The worst case is then all processes perform lock together and $i = n$ (i am process n)
|
||||
- all $p_{1}\dots p_{n}$ surpass $
|
||||
- all $p_{1}\dots p_{n}$ surpass $p_{n}$
|
||||
- then $p_n$ enters and it resets the DATE in its unlock
|
||||
- only 1 reset and it is the worst case!
|
||||
|
||||
**Theorem:** the algorithm satisfies bounded bypass with bound $2n-2$.
|
||||
*Proof:*
|
||||
![[Pasted image 20250310103703.png]]
|
||||
so by this, the very worst possible case is that my lock experiences that.
|
||||
|
||||
It looks like I can experience at most $2n-1$ other critical sections, but it is even better, let's see:
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue