vault backup: 2025-03-25 17:07:22
This commit is contained in:
parent
1eef509d01
commit
51be7d3a8f
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
|
@ -94,9 +94,9 @@ Forall i
|
|||
|
||||
$\Omega_{X}$ is not stronger than ♢P (so, ♢P is strictly stronger)
|
||||
|
||||
The formal proof consists in showing that if $\Omega$ was stronger than ♢P, then consensus would be possible in an asynchronous system with crashes and atomic R/W registers.
|
||||
|
||||
#### From obstruction-freedom to wait-freedom
|
||||
The formal proof consists in showing that if $\Omega_{X}$ was stronger than ♢P, then consensus would be possible in an asynchronous system with crashes and atomic R/W registers.
|
||||
(because ♢P can solve consensus, )
|
||||
#### A contention manager for ♢P
|
||||
We assume a weak timestamp generator, i.e. a function such that, if it returns a positive value t to some process, only a finite number of invocations can obtain a timestamp smaller than or equal to t
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue