vault backup: 2025-05-05 09:07:04

This commit is contained in:
Marco Realacci 2025-05-05 09:07:04 +02:00
parent aeca70e82d
commit 5e8a3d05f1
3 changed files with 12 additions and 1 deletions

View file

@ -213,6 +213,7 @@
}, },
"active": "cdcc59f1bf6d4ae1", "active": "cdcc59f1bf6d4ae1",
"lastOpenFiles": [ "lastOpenFiles": [
"Pasted image 20250505090603.png",
"Concurrent Systems/slides/class 15.pdf", "Concurrent Systems/slides/class 15.pdf",
"Concurrent Systems/notes/15 - A formal language for LTSs.md", "Concurrent Systems/notes/15 - A formal language for LTSs.md",
"Pasted image 20250505085454.png", "Pasted image 20250505085454.png",

View file

@ -34,4 +34,14 @@ hence, P |= ☐aFF holds true only if P cannot perform any action a
![](../../Pasted%20image%2020250505085454.png) ![](../../Pasted%20image%2020250505085454.png)
Let us now define the set of formulae satisfied by a process as $$L(P) = \{ \phi \in Form:P \models \phi \}$$ Let us now define the set of formulae satisfied by a process as $$L(P) = \{ \phi \in Form:P \models \phi \}$$
To simplify the proof, let us modify the set of formulae To simplify the proof, let us modify the set of formulae by allowing conjunctions over a numerable set of formulae
##### Theorem $$P \sim Q \space iif \space L(P)=L(Q)$$
(=>) By induction on the syntax tree of the formula, let's show that $$φ∈L(P) \space iff \space φ∈L(Q)$$
*Base case:* The only possible case is with φ = TT.
- by the satisfiability relation, $\phi$ belongs to the set of formulae of every process
- so also to L(P) and L(Q)
*Inductive step:* Let's assume the thesis for every tree of height at most h. Let h+1 be the height of $\phi$. Let's distinguish on the outmost operator in $\phi$
![](../../Pasted%20image%2020250505090603.png)

Binary file not shown.

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 381 KiB