vault backup: 2025-03-18 16:40:04
This commit is contained in:
parent
32053062f6
commit
7092fd7c4d
1 changed files with 7 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -60,7 +60,13 @@ We now show that $\to$ is acyclic.
|
|||
- $op3 \to_H op4$ means that $res(op3) <_H inv(op4)$
|
||||
|
||||
- We would then have that $res(op1) <_H inv(op2) <_H res(op3) <_H inv(op4)$
|
||||
- So by transitivity $res(op1) <_H inv(op4)$
|
||||
- So by transitivity $res(op1) <_H inv(op4)$, i.e. $op1 \to_H op4$
|
||||
- IN CONTRADICTION WITH HAVING CHOSEN A SHORTEST CYCLE
|
||||
- as if op4 = op1, then this could not happen as $\to$ is a total order.
|
||||
|
||||
This said, we can say that **every DAG admits a topological order** (a total order of its nodes that respects the edges), we will call $\to'$ the topological order for $\to$
|
||||
|
||||
Let us define a linearization of $\hat{H}$ as follows: $$\hat{S}=inv(op1)res(op1)$$
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
> [!PDF|red] class 6, p.6> we would have a cycle of length
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue