vault backup: 2025-04-08 09:37:21
This commit is contained in:
parent
05c144a5d1
commit
7f58845b20
2 changed files with 9 additions and 6 deletions
|
@ -29,7 +29,11 @@ In concurrency theory, we don’t use finite automata but Labeled Transition Sys
|
|||
- automata fix one starting state, whereas in an LTS every state can be considered as initial (this corresponds to different possible behaviors of the process)
|
||||
- automata rely on final states for describing the language accepted, whereas in LTS this notion is not very informative
|
||||
|
||||
Fix a set of action names (or, simply, actions), written N.
|
||||
>[!note] LTS formal definition
|
||||
>Fix a set of action names (or, simply, actions), written N.
|
||||
>
|
||||
>A Labeled Transition System (LTS) is a pair (Q, T), where Q is the set of states and T is the transition relation (T ⊆ Q × N × Q).
|
||||
|
||||
We shall usually write s –a–> s′ instead of ⟨s,a,s′⟩ ∈ T.
|
||||
|
||||
### Bisimulation
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue