vault backup: 2025-03-10 22:18:12
This commit is contained in:
parent
97bb4e0469
commit
a67c8416a2
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
4
.obsidian/workspace.json
vendored
4
.obsidian/workspace.json
vendored
|
@ -211,13 +211,13 @@
|
||||||
"active": "dd6c003f9d17b0e9",
|
"active": "dd6c003f9d17b0e9",
|
||||||
"lastOpenFiles": [
|
"lastOpenFiles": [
|
||||||
"Concurrent Systems/notes/3a - Hardware primitives & Lamport Bakery algorithm.md",
|
"Concurrent Systems/notes/3a - Hardware primitives & Lamport Bakery algorithm.md",
|
||||||
|
"Concurrent Systems/notes/3b - Aravind's algorithm and improvements.md",
|
||||||
|
"Concurrent Systems/notes/1 - CS Basics.md",
|
||||||
"Concurrent Systems/notes/2b - Round Robin algorithm.md",
|
"Concurrent Systems/notes/2b - Round Robin algorithm.md",
|
||||||
"Concurrent Systems/notes/2 - Fast mutex by Lamport.md",
|
"Concurrent Systems/notes/2 - Fast mutex by Lamport.md",
|
||||||
"Concurrent Systems/notes/3b - Aravind's algorithm and improvements.md",
|
|
||||||
"Concurrent Systems/slides/class 3.pdf",
|
"Concurrent Systems/slides/class 3.pdf",
|
||||||
"Pasted image 20250310172134.png",
|
"Pasted image 20250310172134.png",
|
||||||
"Pasted image 20250310103703.png",
|
"Pasted image 20250310103703.png",
|
||||||
"Concurrent Systems/notes/1 - CS Basics.md",
|
|
||||||
"Concurrent Systems/notes/1 - CS Basics2.md",
|
"Concurrent Systems/notes/1 - CS Basics2.md",
|
||||||
"Concurrent Systems/notes/1b - Peterson algorithm.md",
|
"Concurrent Systems/notes/1b - Peterson algorithm.md",
|
||||||
"HCIW/slides/Interface and Interaction for IoT.pdf",
|
"HCIW/slides/Interface and Interaction for IoT.pdf",
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ unlock() :=
|
||||||
return
|
return
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
>[!note] a>It is bounded bypass with bound n-1>
|
>[!note] It is bounded bypass with bound n-1>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Safe registers
|
### Safe registers
|
||||||
Atomic R/W and specialized HW primitives provide some form of atomicity. But is it possible to enforce MUTEX without atomicity?
|
Atomic R/W and specialized HW primitives provide some form of atomicity. But is it possible to enforce MUTEX without atomicity?
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue