vault backup: 2025-04-14 11:59:53

This commit is contained in:
Marco Realacci 2025-04-14 11:59:53 +02:00
parent efea5d2d41
commit ad90da6608

View file

@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ where S1 and S2 are bisimulations, then we have to show that S is a bisimulation
*Proof:* *Proof:*
The proof is done by showing that is a simulation. The proof is done by showing that is a simulation.
By definition of similarity, we have to show that $$∀(p,q)∈∼ ∀p a> p ∃q a> q s.t.(p,q)∈∼$$ By definition of similarity, we have to show that ∀(p,q)∈∼ ∀p a> p ∃q a> q s.t.(p,q)∈∼
Let us fix a pair (p,q) ∈∼ Let us fix a pair (p,q) ∈∼
Bisimilarity of p and q implies the existence of a bisimulation S such that (p,q) ∈ S. Bisimilarity of p and q implies the existence of a bisimulation S such that (p,q) ∈ S.
Hence, for every transition p a> p, there exists a transition q a> q such that (p, q) ∈ S. Hence, for every transition p a> p, there exists a transition q a> q such that (p, q) ∈ S.