vault backup: 2025-04-14 11:59:53
This commit is contained in:
parent
efea5d2d41
commit
ad90da6608
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
|
@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ where S1 and S2 are bisimulations, then we have to show that S is a bisimulation
|
|||
*Proof:*
|
||||
The proof is done by showing that ∼ is a simulation.
|
||||
|
||||
By definition of similarity, we have to show that $$∀(p,q)∈∼ ∀p –a–> p′ ∃q –a–> q′ s.t.(p′,q′)∈∼$$
|
||||
By definition of similarity, we have to show that ∀(p,q)∈∼ ∀p –a–> p′ ∃q –a–> q′ s.t.(p′,q′)∈∼
|
||||
Let us fix a pair (p,q) ∈∼
|
||||
Bisimilarity of p and q implies the existence of a bisimulation S such that (p,q) ∈ S.
|
||||
Hence, for every transition p –a–> p′, there exists a transition q –a–> q′ such that (p′, q′) ∈ S.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue